Many a times we hear a cry that politicians should retire, at a certain fixed age like other professions. This is a well justified demand. We should expect these people — who govern the country — to be efficient. But then a pertinent question arises - what should be the ideal age when a politician should retire. Some say it should be 65 while some others argue that it should be 75. I, however, don’t believe in any such age-barriers. A 70-year old person may be more energetic than a 30-year old… it all depends on how one lives his life.
I have a different idea. I think that the politicians should be made to sit in an annual examination. The exam should be a simple one focussing on reasoning and analytical skills as well as memory test, also touching upon elementary arithmetic and a bit of G.K. on current affairs. A pass marks will be set… one has to pass to be eligible to contest in elections. The consequences will be great and far-reaching. Half-literate politicians will no longer enable to occupy important chairs anymore. Many a times we have to suffer for illogical decisions taken by imbecile ministers… this will put an end to that.
Sounds fascinating? It does, it does… It is a nearly impossible proposition. All politicians will vehemently protest against such an exam-system and even if this ever executed in practice our corrupted netas will soon reduce it to a mockery by cheating, leaking the question paper, bribing the invigilators, forcing the invigilators to cooperate at gun-point…and what not? Such is their nature!
Blast From The PastTOEFL gets tough!Know your connection speedBolt From The BlueSlick New Search Engine from Google sans the BrandingChange of trackKaran Thapar, the Devil’s AdvocateThe Plight of Doctors in BengalDown Memory LaneWBJEE 2006 — Pattern Changed